The Charcoal Project

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Who We Are
  • What We Do
  • News
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Archive
Brazil introduces plan for charcoal consumption to protect native
Tool: generating carbon credits from stove projects (PCIA)

Green tech, clean fuels for the rich and wood, charcoal, and animal dung for the poor.

April 9, 2010    

OPINION

In forging ahead this week with our research to discover the cost to society of global biomass consumption using traditional technology (aka “three stones and a pot” or “open fire”), I spoke with Professor Lakshman Guruswamy at the University of Colorado. Guruswamy, a jovial Sri-Lankan native is Professor of International Environmental Law and Director of the University’s Center for Energy & Environmental Security (CEES).

Guruswamy is also one of the world’s leading experts in the field of Energy Justice in relation to the Energy Oppressed People (EOP) (his terms). Both concepts were, until recently, novel ideas to me.

In a recent white paper, Professor Guruswamny makes the point that, “between 2 and 2.5 billion people, amounting to nearly a third of the world, rely upon bio-mass generated fire as their principal source of energy. Unlike the rest of the world, they live without access to energy generated lighting, space heating, cooking, and mechanical power. The plight of these energy oppressed peoples (EOP), who face almost insuperable human, social, and economic development, cries out for energy justice. (My emphasis)

Unfortunately, world attention has almost exclusively been focused on problems of global warming arising from the use and misuse of fossil fuel energy. The world’s decision makers, demonstrated once again, at the climate change conference in Copenhagen, that they are almost obsessively concerned with the emissions of carbon dioxide. They remained oblivious to the lament of disease, problems of public health, lack of safe drinking water, non access to education, sickness, death, and economic deprivation, not attributable to carbon dioxide. In keeping with this approach, they continued to ignore the energy-based problems, afflicting a third of the world’s population, caused by the absence of modern sustainable energy. While some slight attention was paid to the poor who generated carbon dioxide emissions, the plight of the non carbon dioxide generating EOP was totally ignored.”

Whether or not you agree with the Professor, it’s clear that industrialized and emerging nations are poised to leap into the clean fuel and green technology era, leaving behind nearly a third of the world’s population who is destined to continue burning wood, charcoal, and animal dung using noxious technologies that have remained unevolved for the last 3000 years.

So, what gives?

In his paper, Guruswamy says that “the situation of the EOP is intolerable under any canon of justice, and cries out for redress.[4] Geopolitically, developing peoples[5] have the right to develop, and developed countries have a duty to help them do so. Energy is a prerequisite to sustainable development and to addressing issues of poverty, hunger, education, gender equality, child and maternal health, sanitation, and environmental protection.”

Regardless of any emotions elicited by the use of the terms “energy justice,” or “energy oppressed people,” Guruswamy makes an irrefutable and compelling philosophical and practical case for the urgent need to address this issue, and it boils down to this:

1. A developing country has a right to develop and to do so requires energy, and lots of it.

2. There are no plans in the horizon designed to solve the energy problems of developing countries that don’t involve massive investments in fossil fuels

3. The call for reduction in CO2 emissions by the climate change movement puts it at odds with the right of developing countries to build their economies and improve their people’s lot.

Happily, Professor Guruswamy provides us with important strategy to address this conundrum.

He calls it the ASETs program.

ASETs stands for Appropriate Sustainable Energy Technologies. Guruswamy describes “ASETs as low-cost, clean, non-hydrocarbon energy sources from mundane technologies, adapted to the culture of the users, to supply the unmet needs of the EOP. For example, cleaner burning cook-stoves and cooking fuels can alleviate indoor air pollution from black soot while also reducing global warming. (Yes!) Many other mundane technologies already exist to promote better agriculture and encourage women, now freed from illness and hours of fuel gathering, to start small local businesses.” (Yes! Yes!)


from The Need for Energy Justice by Lakshman Guruswamy, Director CEES




Under Guruswamy’s leadership, the Center for Energy and Environmental Security (CEES) at Colorado Law has launched a critical new initiative they call The World Energy Justice Project (WEJP). WEJP’s mission is to mainstream safe, clean, and efficient energy for the world’s Energy Oppressed Poor (EOP), the two and a half billion people living on less than $1-2 a day who have no access to modern energy services.

Starting this summer Guruswamy and his team will set up camp in the remote Andean hamlet of Ayaviri, just above the tree-line at 13,000 feet, where the people eek out the barest of existance. Their first step is to carry out a needs assessment based on careful listening and in close collaboration with the village leaders and its people. What is it they desire most? Clean water? Schools for the children? Better fuels? More nutritious food? Once completed, the needs assessment should point the way to the ASETs to be used that will best address the people’s need using low carbon technology.

If all goes well, The World Energy Justice Project will scale up and help bring energy relief to 2.5 billion of the world’s energy poor.

Low carbon + energy alleviation, now that’s something we can all get behind!

We will keep you posted on the progress of The World’s Energy Justice Project!






The road to Ayaviri, Peru






Tagged: Copenhagen, Crisis, Human development, Policy, Poverty

Previous Post
Next Post

1 Comment

Click here to cancel reply.

Leave a comment.

(will not be published)

Recent Posts

  • The Twitteruniverse roundup: MDG failure, money talks, mapping the biosphere, and delivering energy to the energy-poor
  • Now it gets interesting: Indian Govt & X Prize announced global competition for best clean-burning cookstove!
  • The missing MDG goal: energy poverty alleviation
  • Can the Gates-ian approach to treating infectious disease work to alleviate energy poverty?
  • TANZANIA: Bank dishes out 1.5bn TzS for training of charcoal producers
  • View all posts.

What's Hot

  • Endangered gorillas threatened by charcoal trade in Virunga, DRC
  • Environment & Poverty
  • Improved stoves and household energy
  • MIT's Amy Smith speaks at TED
  • Partnership for Clean Indoor Air

Recent News

  • TANZANIA: Bank dishes out 1.5bn TzS for training of charcoal producers
  • Rainforest destruction progresses in waves
  • Madagascar: Drought forces farmers into charcoal devastation

Enter your email address to receive updates:

 

Africa alternative energy Amy Smith Biochar Black Carbon briquettes Carbon market CDM Charcoal Charcoal Project charcoal trade Climate Change Congo Copenhagen Crisis culture D-Lab energy poverty fuelwood global partnership Goma Haiti indoor air pollution jatropha Kenya Kiln Kivu Madagascar Mercy Corps MIT National Policy PCIA Peru Poverty REDD regulation resources South America Stoves Tanzania The Charcoal Project Tuyeni Valuing Biomass Voluntary Carbon Market World Energy Outlook

Copyright © 2009-10 The Charcoal Project